Plane crash-lands in San Francisco |
But the National
Transportation Safety Board also found that crew training and the
complexities of a key flight system on the Boeing 777 and how it was
described in operating manuals contributed to the July 6 disaster.
Investigators, however,
primarily faulted the crew of the Korean-based carrier for not fully
executing intricate systems of the jetliner packed with more than 300
people before it struck a seawall and careened down Runway 28L trailing
sparks and debris.
In a final report on its
probe, the board found that the flight crew mismanaged the plane's
descent being carried out without the help of navigational instruments
and one of the pilots unintentionally deactivated a system that
automatically regulates airspeed.
The crew also delayed its
decision to abort the landing with the plane flying too slowly to avoid
catastrophe, investigators found.
The final conclusion was
largely in line with early assumptions of investigators facing the most
serious commercial airline crash in the United States since a Colgan Air
commuter plane fell out of the sky over Buffalo, killing 49 people in
February 2009. Crew actions were also singled out in that accident.
Aviation experts agree
that aircraft automation has made flying safer, and the 777 is one of
the most sophisticated jetliners in service.
"But the more complex
automation becomes, the more challenging it is to ensure that the pilots
adequately understand it," Christopher Hart, the acting safety board
chairman said in a statement. "In this instance, the flight crew
over-relied on automated systems that they did not fully understand. As a
result, they flew the aircraft too low and too slow and collided with
the seawall at the end of the runway."
No comments:
Post a Comment